Showing posts with label Terry McAuliffe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terry McAuliffe. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Will Conservatives Heed the Lesson of 2021?

 

Things have certainly changed in Virginia since the November election.

Though in all likelihood not in the way in which most probably think. 

While Virginia Democrats continue for the most part to recover from the the massive political hangover of losing the Executive and the House of Delegates with the reality setting in that they are now once again the "opposition" Party in Richmond, directional leadership for the Democrats in the words of State Senator Lucas (D) has morphed into nothing more than a "firewall".

This "firewall" as Senator Lucas puts it on her newly formed Twitter feed since assuming control of the majority for Democrats in the Virginia Senate is and will always be nothing more than obstructionism which in the end will not sit very well with voters come the 2022 Congressional elections let alone the 2023 election where every member of the Virginia Senate will be on the ballot.



Unfortunately, the far right Conservative wing of the Virginia GOP has yet to awaken from its same, tired tactical positions regarding the "establishment". These are the Conservatives that spend more time on social media attacking fellow Republicans than they do working with communities to ensure that Republicans begin the process of returning the "trifecta" of state governance back to the Republicans.

It appears though it is very early that many in the Conservative camp on the far right have yet to accept let alone learn from the lessons that the November election have presented not only in Virginia but in places like New Jersey, New York and elsewhere.

The fact of the matter is if you examine the shifts in Virginia from 2013 to 2020 leading into the 2021 election of Executive offices the Republicans by all accounts should have lost. They didn't.

The question that Conservatives should be examining is why the Virginia GOP overcame the shift in demographics and voting trends and won and by doing so it would better prepare them for the campaign seasons ahead. The truth is the GOP campaign machine was old and tired. It had repeatedly got its ass kicked by a younger, flexible and social media savvy Democrat Party that leveraged local assets on the ground with "foreign" money to finance victories. "Foreign"  money is that from California, New York, Illinois etc that have filled the coffers of the Democrat Party for a decade and fueled a radical, progressive agenda not only in schools but also in the justice system via Commonwealth Attorneys.

The Governor Youngkin campaign has changed the board. Not only the board but the entire game.

Youngkin's campaign in 2021 mirrored many other Republican Governors that in fact are governing "blue states". The Youngkin campaign capitalized on the campaign stupidity from the former Governor Terry McAuliffe campaign but also did many things that prior GOP campaigns failed to do and that was to stow away the far right "populist" jargon for a message that resonated directly to Virginia families and brought those that had supported Democrats in Congressional races over to the GOP. The question now rests with the next field of candidates whether they can sustain the movement and keep those voters aligned with the GOP and risk losing by returning the to campaigning strategies of the last decade resulting in the loss of the Executive and General Assembly in the first place.

Lets face it. The Virginia GOP was rolling in 2012. Even with the consideration of the "scandal" which based on standards today now looks absurd relating the Governor Bob McDonnell (R) the GOP was by all accounts heading to victory in the 2013 election cycle. What prevented victory?

Many will point to the third party run in the election of 2013 that took votes on the edges of the GOP away to the Libertarian  candidate but this is denying the unspoken truth that there was a cancer from within the GOP itself that began to spread and alienate voters almost in the same way that the Democrats alienated many parents in 2021. There was a surge in "anti-establishmentism" back then with much of it centered around Representative Eric Cantor (R) of the 7th Congressional District by way of the Virginia Tea Party. While the Tea Party movement was basically reabsorbed back into the Virginia GOP the sentiment has not gone away with this element of the Virginia GOP.

The sentiment basically was illustrated by State Senator Amanda Freeman Chase(R/I) from Chesterfield County throughout the last four years. Chase cut her teeth in the days of the Tea Party and ultimately helping unseat Cantor played a direct result in the Democrats flipping the House seat in 2018.  By 2020 the Democrats had won victories for Biden and Rep. Spanberger in Chesterfield County long a conservative county. It has been argued that Chase was part of the vocal element that undermined the candidacy of Lt. Governor Bill Bolling (R) in 2013 that would ultimately place Ken Cuccinelli (R) on the ballot for Governor and not Bolling. This cycle signaled the political demise for almost eight years until Governor Youngkin flipped the script.

The biggest difference between Republicans and Democrat activists during this period was the Tea Party put principles ahead of WINNING while the Democrats went about building a ground game that would propel them not only in WINNING but taking control of Richmond and more House seats in the years that followed. The movement is all but dead but has manifested itself in the "populist" movement of the GOP today. Only problem is these individuals are "oppositionists" and nothing more having no opportunities to lead or demonstrate what solutions they would set forth or even attempt to deliver to Virginians. Much of the messaging is tied to valued issues especially Constitutional ones that matter but more Virginians appear to moved back to the old kitchen table issues again not ideological battles like gay marriage or abortion.

Lt. Governor Bolling was popular in Virginia. Had been for years with voters and especially independent voters across Virginia but that was not good enough for those that would label Bolling a "moderate" and prefer to advance backward looking fights and agendas and re-litigating previous battles lost and push for a social conservative far right candidate in Cuccinelli. Of course by the time the GOP was done it was not the "establishment" that pulled the trigger on the series of losses that would plaque the Virginia GOP in the years that followed but rather the ever powerful minority with the party machine that facilitate in truth who will be on any ballot.

Here is some back story on events in 2013 that led to the political wasteland experienced by the Virginia GOP afterward:

In 2008, incumbent lieutenant governor Bill Bolling made a deal with then-Attorney General Bob McDonnell whereby McDonnell would run for governor and Bolling would run for re-election as lieutenant governor in 2009, and then Bolling would receive McDonnell's support for his own candidacy for governor in 2013. The deal was widely known and as such, Bolling was effectively running for governor since 2009,[1] and in April 2010, Bolling filed the necessary paperwork to run in 2013.[2] Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, elected alongside McDonnell and Bolling in 2009, stated that he intended to run for re-election as attorney general in 2013, but did not rule out running for governor.[3] In December 2011, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli told his staff that he would run against Bolling for governor in 2013; the news went public, and in response, Bolling issued a statement accusing Cuccinelli of putting "his own personal ambition ahead of the best interests of the commonwealth and the Republican Party."[4][5][6] This infuriated Bolling and set up a primary.[4] Cuccinelli's announcement came two days before the annual statewide conference of Virginia Republicans, at which Bolling and his staff expressed being upset with Cuccinelli's decision.[7]

In June 2012, the party's State Central Committee, which had new members since the committee previously voted to hold a primary, reversed course and voted 47–31 to select a nominee via convention in 2013, igniting much controversy among party members.[8] The switch was a major blow to Bolling's candidacy, as Cuccinelli supporters were more ardent and involved in the party and thus more willing to travel to a day-long convention.[9] Proponents of the reversal said a convention would prevent Democrats from meddling in the selection (Virginia does not register voters by party, making primaries open to voters regardless of party).[9] Primaries are also run by the State Board of Elections and taxpayer funded; proponents said a convention, which is funded by the party, would save the state money.[8] Convention proponents also argued that nominees selected by convention historically perform better in the general election than nominees selected by primary, and that conventions allow candidates to present their cases within the party, preventing candidates from tearing each other down via negative advertising seen by the general electorate.[8] Opponents of the reversal said a convention would disenfranchise military voters who are unable to physically attend a convention, and would cost the party too much money."

Here and now there are many that still blame Bolling but the fault does not and never lied with Bolling. Rather, it like today lies with the very same people today with the Republican Party that continue to call anyone that does not meet its litmus test of  conservatism a "RINO" or a "False Republican" which of course is the most asinine thing that anyone could ever say pertaining to politics and demonstrates a clear lack of understanding as well as history pertaining to the very party they claim to support.

The Virginia GOP has always been not unlike the national party a coalition. The Tea Party and far right social conservatives have forgotten that or at the very least ignored that fact that without Libertarians, Independents and "Moderates" they would never EVER have any chance statewide. In fact, the record for those running on social conservatism or some strange variation "populist" platform is loss after loss in Virginia.

Again, those that refuse to learn the lessons and repeat the same old, tired strategies in the end lilkely will alienate voters once again. It is all over social media already just months after winning back the House and the Executive the in fighting has already started regarding the spoils apparently and who should be the voice of the Virginia GOP. Well, simple answer? The people that WON! That's who.

Recently, in a thread on the Conservatives for Congress 2022 on Facebook this was illustrated not only by various individuals but also an actual candidate once again advancing the "anti-establishment" or not conservative enough mindset that created the decade of losses to begin with. These individuals are no different than the far left in truth because it is about box checking and litmus tests not relating to people as individuals.

Some went as far as to claim that State Senator Jenn Kiggans (R) who represents the Virginia's 2d Senate District comprised in 2019 of Virginia Beach City and Norfolk City  and who defeated incumbent Cheryl Turpin (D) last cycle where both Governor Northam (D) and U.S. Senator Kaine (D) had previously won by ten or so basis points was not even a "conservative".

  


Why? Well as commented in the thread she happen to vote with Democrats on some bills. Oh the horror. Remember a time when working with the opposition was considered honorable? Nowadays not so much. People in some quarters want nothing more than total allegiance regardless of intent of individual bills proposed on the floor of the legislature. It is tribal to them. They have no notion of Reagan's true strength as a leader and his own philosophies that shaped a blossoming GOP in the 1980's after very similar patterns of economics on late 1970's that the United State very well could endure in the year ahead if things do not change. By todays standards who knows whether some of these people even think Reagan was a conservative. We already know they don't think Rep. Jack Kemp(R) was!

Fact of the matter remains that Kiggans only came under this fire because she has dared to throw herself into the race for the GOP nomination in the 2d Congressional District and has already out raised the other three potential nominees combined. One contributor comment on that thread mentioned above was that Kiggans has never been seen carrying a firearm. The assertion is then of course that she is not a supporter of the Second Amendment yet her ratings disprove that assertion. Is this simply a throw back to the ridiculousness of State Senator Chase holding a rifle and holding it wrong in fact repeatedly in photo ops as somehow the manner in which we determine whether someone is pro-2A or not? Do votes and ratings no longer matter?

Which begs the question. Has the far right populists of the Virginia GOP totally misunderstood that the Kiggans record in the State Senate makes it almost impossible for Rep. Elaine Luria (D) to exploit as "extreme" like she has down twice to the GOP in two consecutive victories for her seat. 

In fact, Luria doubled her winning percentage from 2018 to 2020 which should signal something to the populists. President Biden won this area of the Commonwealth by 5 points in Virginia Beach and won running away with over 71% of the vote in Norfolk City. Youngkin obviously performed much better last November than previous GOP candidates including Trump but many of the populists are ignoring this fact and launching attacks against Kiggans when the voting trends show that she in all likelihood has a greater chance of winning the district than a far right populist. I mean lets be honest, if Trump failed to win himself does anyone really think that someone simply mirroring his message will? The very basis some have argued for Youngkin's victory was he did just the opposite both in tone and message.

But you see this gets back to the whole anti-establishment angler that many on the far right push. These were the same people mind you that opposed Youngkin's candidacy throughout 2021 from within the Virginia GOP. These are those people that hitched their wagons to the ever ambitious State Senator Chase who rallied her supporters calling herself "Trump in heels". She lost. Repeating the same mindset over and over in Virginia elections is not going to change the outcomes for these candidates that cannot understand that shift that has happened in Virginia over the last decade. It is no longer the 1990's. Yougkin like his colleague in Governor Larry Hogan (R) who as one would have it also gets lambasted as a "RINO" and "false conservative" by the same people doing it to Kiggans and did it to Youngkin last year before he won the nomination has provided a road map to the Virginia voter for 2022 and 2023.

The goal for the Virginia GOP should be WINNING not intra party skirmishes like it witnessed in 2013. Remember, in 2012 no one anticipated a Democrat victory for Governor until it became obvious that the Virginia GOP was imploding due to intra party divisions and people portraying "moderates" as somehow "Democrat-lite". But alas if there is a way in which the Virginia GOP could mess this whole thing up the over/under on them doing it it probably pretty high even when you consider everything happening in Washington points to wins for the GOP in 2022 elsewhere across the country.

The Kiggans example is just one. There are other races of course across the Commonwealth with many now directly impacted by the new redistricting plan adopted for Virginia. Tina Ramirez (R) who seemingly came out of nowhere in 2020 in the nomination process for the 7th Congressional District and impressed thousands of voters she almost won the nomination that would go to Delegate Nick Freitas (R).  Now, Ramirez has had to withdraw from the 2022 race given Chesterfield County has been drawn out of the district but Ramirez has determined to run for State Senate in 2023 to represent the newly drawn Senate district. Seemingly a half dozen or so officials have been drawn out of the districts they have either represented or have run for offices in the past few years.

As it stands, most Virginians have had changes in some form or fashion to voting districts as a result of the Supreme Court ruling on redistricting so the rime is now for the ground games to commence especially for a united Virginia GOP that must release any notions of going backward.

There is an opportunity presenting itself right now in Virginia for the Virginia GOP but the reality is the GOP must heed the lessons of 2021 and look to the examples across the country where messaging was focused not on social issues or social dogmas but the very issues one could argue that propelled the GOP to victories decades ago like schools, crime, jobs, limited government and spending cuts----fiscal responsibility!


Friday, August 21, 2020

Virtual Learning: How Gov. Terry McAuliffe and VEA Failed Virginia Families


As the Virginia Legislature continues its "Special Session" next week, one of the biggest issues that will get debated by legislators is how to address the Commonwealth of Virginia's public school system and the lack of "in person" schooling taking place as a direct result of the Covid-19 crisis.

Legislators will have opportunity to consider legislation that attempts to address those students throughout Virginia that live in areas or regions that do not have broadband internet access to facilitate "on-line" or "virtual learning" as well as all the students in the urban and suburban areas with access.

CNM Develops Workshops to Help K-12 Teachers Create Successful ...


However, it is important to remember that the unpreparedness that the Virginia public education system has experienced during the pandemic very well may have been avoided had it not been for Governor Terry McAuliffe and the Virginia Education Association.

In order to understand why things are where they are in Virginia in terms of education it is important to look backward.

This week during the "Special Session" we have seen Delegates using a "virtual" session which they managed to of on Thursday yet many school systems are still lacking the infrastructure or tools to implement such programs effective

"Let’s empower parents to get the technology, to get their kids the technology to learn virtually... Let’s empower parents to get the tutoring and in-person teaching their children need to excel, regardless of how much money they make.” stated Delegate Carrie Coyner (R).

"I would hope that we would support school systems as they go virtual...not because it’s what we want, but because where we are right now in this epidemic it’s what we need. It’s what’s doable. It’s where students can best learn.” Delegate Schuyler VanValkenburg (D).

Both Coyner and VanValkenburg have experience in education. Coyner is a former School Board member in Chesterfield County and VanValkenburg is a teacher in Henrico County. Both entered the House of Delegates after Governor Terry McAuliffe had left office and never had the opportunity to vote on Virginia's Virtual School Board first introduced in 2016.

These two counties represent significant school age populations in suburban Richmond rivaled only on Northern Virginia counties like Fairfax.

Where other states have transitioned to on-line or "virtual learning" though such platforms as Google classroom or Blackboard, Virginia lags behind. The question becomes how is it that Virginia get caught so off guard during the pandemic with the extended periods of no "in-person" learning and how could the state leave local jurisdictions in such a position of unpreparedness to deal with the situation.

Truth be told this very situation very well could have been avoided entirely. Republicans began working on legislation as early as 2015 regarding increasing the funding in the area of virtual learning though you will not hear much of that around Richmond these days. Members of both parties supported vital legislation in 2016 and 2017 that would have moved virtual learning forward in Virginia with the necessary funding. Virginia did in fact already have some on line learning programs through the Department of Education however, the virtual learning transformation sought via the legislation would have created a virtual school independently.

Here is the measure. Both Senate Bill 1240 and House Bill 1400 were identical.

Republicans Siobhan Dunnavant in the Senate and "Dickie" Bell in the House were the chief patrons of these vital virtual learning bills in 2017.


SB 1240 Virginia Virtual School Board

Virginia Virtual School established. Establishes the Board of the Virginia Virtual School (the Board) as a policy agency in the executive branch of state government for the purpose of governing the full-time virtual school programs offered to students enrolled in the Virginia Virtual School (the School). The Secretary of Education is responsible for such agency. The 14-member Board is given operational control of the School and assigned powers and duties. Beginning with the 2019-2020 school year, the bill requires the School to be open to any school-age person in the Commonwealth and to provide an educational program meeting the Standards of Quality for grades kindergarten through 12, with a maximum enrollment of 5,000 students statewide. The bill requires the average state share of Standards of Quality per pupil funding for each enrolled student to be transferred to the School

Incorporates S.B 1380 ( Sen. Petersen (D) )
Incorporates S.B.  1570 (Se. Peake (R) )
02/03/17 Passes 38--0- 1 abstention Senate
02/20/17 Passes the House of Delegates 59-37

03/13/17- Vetoed by Governor Terry McAuliffe (D) 
04/05/17  Senate sustains Governors Veto  21-19
04/05/17- Veto Overide fails in Senate--- requires  27 YES votes.

So what happened? Why did this particular bill supported by both the House and Senate that not only passed in 2017 but had also passed both in 2016 get vetoed a second time by Governor Terry McAuliffe (D). This may provide insight.

         Gobernador de VA restaura el derecho al voto a ex convictos ...

This comes from the Virginia Education Association (VEA) Daily Reports dated April 6, 2017. Clearly the VEA stood in the way of this significant legislation becoming law. This provides some insight of how the lobbying efforts of the VEA who represents teachers throughout Virginia who pay membership may have directly resulted in where Virginia is today with virtual learning and why Virginia is playing catch up some three years later.

VEA had Virtual School Board in effect killed even after legislators supported it until the Governor vetoed the measure.

"Every year, on a Wednesday, six weeks after the close of session, the General Assembly reconvenes to take up the Governor's action on the bills passed by the legislature during the regular session. Yesterday was that day. Governor McAuliffe has vetoed 40 bills this session. Delegate Kirk Cox gave a floor speech announcing that the Governor has set a single-session record for vetoes. Because all his vetoes held, Governor McAuliffe has vetoed 111 bills during his term. That is a term record as well. Governor Gilmore has the next highest number- 91 vetoes. Delegate Toscano did remind the House that many of the House bills the Governor vetoed this session are identical to bills he vetoed last session.

The VEA was following a group of bills. These bills are all bad for public education and we are thankful to our members who have called, emailed, and written the Governor asking for his veto. We are also grateful that WE WERE HEARD! Governor McAuliffe vetoed all of the bills we requested. We expect the vetoes to be upheld since you need a 2/3 vote to overturn a veto. The Senate sits at 21-19, so it is very difficult to get a 2/3 vote in that body. The House, on the other hand, sits at 66-34, just one vote away from a 2/3 vote possibility. We followed the House closely, but we felt good that we had locked up our votes. Thank you to the 34 members of the House of Delegates who stood with us on the vetoes!

Today we will watch the following veto votes:

House Bill 1400, Delegate Dickie Bell's Virtual School Bill (the Senate version, Senate Bill 1240, from Senator Dunnavant is identical to the House bill and was also vetoed). In his veto, the Governor questioned the constitutionality of these bills. He also commented that, even with off-session work to improve this legislation, it passed in a nearly identical form as House Bill 8 from the 2016 session that he also vetoed. These bills would establish a separate Virtual School Board independent of the Virginia Board of Education and would receive state funding on a per-pupil basis based, draining those resources from our traditional public schools. All school divisions in VA are already required to offer on-line courses, and the VA Department of Education already offers full-time, virtual high school. The VEA opposed these bills and we are grateful the veto was upheld. In the House, the 34 Democrats were joined by Republican Delegates Bloxom, Farrell, Habeeb, Helsel, Hugo, Miller, Ware and Yost in sustaining the Governor's veto."


These bills in 2017 were first introduced in 2016 as House Bill 8. The Daily Press reported the following on March 31, 2016:


"Under the legislation, a student will be able to enroll in a state-approved virtual program if a parent determines that doing so is in the "best interest of such student," but no more than 2 percent of all students in a division could enroll.

The school would be tuition-free to all students, but comes with a $275,000 initial start up cost in Fiscal Year 2018 under the General Assembly-approved budget.

The state share of the per-pupil funding provided to each division would be transferred to the virtual school"


This was the basis it seems for the VEA determined effort for two years to keep the "Virtual School Board" from happening. The state share of the per student funding to local jurisdictions would be impacted if such a board were established and create an entity that very well may have been beyond its lobbying control.


So when Virginia parents look to Richmond for answers in terms of the circumstance the Commonwealth education system faces now with no in-person schooling to start the school year and the majority of school systems having to implement "virtual learning" understand that Virginia has been here before. Richmond had the opportunity not once but twice in 2016 and 2017 to get a jump start on such virtual learning for students and the VEA and Governor Terry McAuliffe(D) failed them.


Jonathan Scott

Guest Contributor