In July 2019, the Commonwealth of Virginia celebrated 400 years as the birthplace of democracy in the Americas. Virginia celebrated four hundred year anniversary of the First Representative Legislative Assembly which was instituted in summer of 1619 at Jamestown.
This celebration however, was not the only one that the Commonwealth of Virginia commemorated in 2019. What we are witnessing today, as protests focusing heavily on the goal of removing every physical representation of significant parts of Virginia and American history writ large continue to take place, is an attempt to completely erase our past. If we want to be truly honest regarding Virginia, let's take a look at how it has actually approached representing its history. Virginia, as a state, has a long standing tradition of "sharing the full story," inclusive of the many proud moments, but also the challenging or uncomfortable pieces. Additionally, it has never sought to focus, or in truth even economically capitalize, on the Confederate period like other southern cities have.
To this point, where have we seen a state funded "Confederate" program on the scale in Virginia as say the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign? Where have we seen our hospitality and tourism entities work to elevate the historical period of the Civil War? The period has always been a companion element to tourism, as logic would stand to reason, the past cannot be changed, but hardly a focus. One only has to compare Richmond, Virginia to Charleston, South Carolina to fully understand the difference and the very foundation of where the progressive academia portrayal of Virginia and Richmond herself is not only misplaced but also historically inaccurate.
2019 marked the 400th Anniversary of the first slave arriving at Jamestown and the first recorded slaves to arrive in the English colonies. Most historians place these slaves' origins to be Western Africa and were brought to the New World not by the English that settled the Virginia colony but by Portuguese slave traders.
In light of the past month it is hard to understand the perpetual misrepresentation of Virginia as a Commonwealth that has never embraced its African American community or its past. It may certainly be as simple as the fact that the Civil War created the narrative backdrop or "sword" that continues to be used against Virginia routinely by academia and activists alike. Under the framework of racial justice, progressive liberal voices, often found in the world of academia, neglect to present the whole narrative, including the historiography associated with how Virginia tells its own story. Not only is this academically dishonest, but quite dangerous and harmful. As the famous quote from German essaying Heinrich Heine (1797-1856) states, "Where they burn books, they too in the end burn people."
Virginia has long been more of a "progressive" state than any other former Confederate state in the South. Virginia is targeted by those from other geographic regions in the US and with other experiences that are then projected upon Virginia. What these activists fail to realize, is that Virginia has long attempted to address the stains of the Civil War. In truth, they have advanced past most every issue these activists have raised the last month in Richmond and Washington D.C.
Additionally, there is substantial evidence that Virginia has never actually mirrored its Southern brethern in many regards post Reconstruction. For example, much of the commemoration for to Virginian leaders of the Civil War was less about Confederate ideals and more about the fact these men were the lore of that century no different than the one prior and George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and other Revolutionaries. In the 1890's to 1910 period Virginia witnessed a resurgence in commemorating the Civil War period not over many aspects that the Progressive academia like to focus upon but rather the fact that the men who participated in the war were now no longer with Virginia. Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson had died in the war along with Jeb Stuart and Robert E. Lee died in 1870. Twenty five years after the war the first monuments began to go up all over the country honoring both Union and Confederate leaders that commanded men in both armies. It is important to examine the aspects of society that differed in this time period than would in the century that followed. Its was closer to the Revolutionary tradition than present day of course. Examine how many Korean or Vietnam statues or monuments dedicated to "individual" men exist in America. These wars unlike the Civil War resulted in monuments dedicated to participants in those foreign wars in mass or collectively and not honoring individual leaders.
This is an aspect that gets lost on Progressive academia that influences the activism that we witness today. These Confederate Generals along Monument Avenue commanded divisions of Virginians. Unlike today's military, units during the Civil War were formed within communities and counties or "Home Guards". Fathers fought alongside sons and brothers alongside brothers. If you were born in 1855 you would have been forty years old at the time the Robert E. Lee monument was erected. Much of your life you would have heard story after story regarding the war and the Reconstruction from the devastation. Much of the mood regarding the erecting monuments had little to do with racial connotations but rather the two decades it took for the war torn South to recover from the wear itself.
It is easy for Progressive academia today to point to statues and monuments and say they were erected to advance hate and yet much of the historical evidence from first hand accounts says otherwise and the majority of the commemoration speeches were not centered around the "Lost Cause" ideology they profess they did. The Lost Cause ideology did not come into existence until much later.
Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States.[1] These laws were enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by white Democratic-dominated state legislatures to disenfranchise and remove political and economic gains made by blacks during the Reconstruction period.[2] The Jim Crow laws were enforced until 1965.[3]
In practice, Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities in the states of the former Confederate States of America and in some others, beginning in the 1870s. Jim Crow laws were upheld in 1896 in the case of Plessy vs. Ferguson, in which the U.S. Supreme Court laid out its "separate but equal" legal doctrine for facilities for African Americans. Moreover, public education had essentially been segregated since its establishment in most of the South after the Civil War in 1861–65. (Wikipedia).
In 1913 it was Southern Democrat President Woodrow Wilson (New Jersey) that segregated the entire federal workforce. Wilson was the first Southern-born President having been raised in Virginia elected post Reconstruction and upon election placed many segregationists in his cabinet. Most are left with the impression that all the things resulting from Jim Crow all happened in a short period of time and the monuments were all tied to these practices when in truth if you consider that the Supreme Court heard Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 that upheld the Jim Crow laws in place and did not hear Brown v. Board of Education until 1954 some fifty years had past. Progressive activists from Monumental Lies advocated replacing Civil War figures with people like Woodrow Wilson and other Democratic figures from the period and yet this totally ignores the totality of the actual history of this period. Its does not examine each individual man but rather the advocacy based solely on tribalism.
In its continued attempts to evaluate all Virginia life through the lens of racial inequality, Progressive academia is disingenuous regarding the true history of the people of Virginia and the "progress" Virginia has made over the last century with regard to the diversity that exists in the Commonwealth. It is very hard to attempt to exploit the expressed condition of racial inequality and indifference in a state that elected the first African American Governor in Douglas Wilder. Virginia elected the Virginia's son, Douglas Wilder in 1989 defeated popular Republican Marshall Coleman and served Virginia from 1990-94 after having served as Lt. Governor the four years prior and before that as a State Senator.
Virginia further dismissed the notions that the legacy of the Confederacy was actually still a thing when as it has continually filled its General Assembly with diversity of race, gender and national origin. Virginia has become one of the most diverse Southern States in the county and its State Legislature reflects this dynamic. In 2008 and 2012 Virginians supported Barrack H. Obama for President. Obama won Virginia by six points in 2008 and four points in 2012. Ironically, Progressive academia will never provide this context but Virginia did not support Bill Clinton, a southern Governor, for President in either 1992 or 1996. In fact, the last Democratic President that Virginians supported prior to Obama was Lyndon B. Johnson (D) in 1964. How much "progress" has Virginia made? Virginia in 1960 did not even support John F. Kennedy yet decades later after Civil Rights Movement elects the first African American Governor and then supports the first African American President not once but twice.
Progressives dismiss much of this of course. In fact they will not support a statue for Governor Doug Wilder (D) in large part because they do not wish for that to undermine the true nature of their agenda. Their fear has long been a statue honoring Wilder would neuter their cause. It is easy to point to all the "Confederate monuments" and depict them as such rather than Virginian monuments honoring those that led men in a war that cost almost 35,000 Virginian lives on battlefields throughout Virginia and beyond.
What the Progressive academia and activists will not tell you of course is that the 2019 Commemoration and American Evolution African-American focused events were celebrated throughout Virginia:
- Faith Journeys in the Black Experience 1619-2019 Conference, March 19 – 21, 2019, Richmond, VA: The Virginia Council of Churches, and the Samuel DeWitt Proctor School of Theology at Virginia Union University will convene a conference focusing on "The Missiology of Jamestown 1619 and Its Implications" to explore long-standing assumptions related to Christian mission. It will focus on religion in 1619 Jamestown, its impact on Native Americans and Africans, and the origins of a religious and culturally diverse 21st-century America.
- Historic Jamestowne: Democracy & Diversity, April 1 – September 30, 2019, Williamsburg, VA: Jamestown Rediscovery and the National Park Service will focus on the establishment of representative government and rule of law, protections for private property, and sustained encounters among different peoples – Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans – who first came together at Jamestown. This includes programs that exhibit the site where one of the first documented Africans in Virginia, "Angela," lived in the mid-1620s.
- Dance Theatre of Harlem World Premiere, May 3 – 5, 2019, Norfolk, VA: The 2019 Commemoration and the Virginia Arts Festival have commissioned an original interpretive ballet from Dance Theatre of Harlem, which explores the African arrival story and the ongoing impact of diversity in America today.
- Cosmologies from the Tree of Life: Art from the African American South, June 8 – November 17, 2019, Richmond, VA: Timed to coincide with the 400th anniversary of the 1619 arrival of the first Africans in Virginia, this special exhibition celebrates the extraordinary contributions that African American artists have made to art and culture since that time. The exhibition will include paintings, sculptures, installations, drawings and quilts from the VMFA's permanent collection and will feature recent acquisitions from contemporary Southern African American artists. This exhibit will reflect the Commonwealth's and nation's historical diversity and complexity, which are cornerstones of the 2019 Commemoration.
- Determined: The 400-year Struggle for Black Equality, June 19, 2019 – January 5, 2020, Richmond, VA: The Virginia Museum of History & Culture exhibition will explore the African American experience from the arrival of the first Africans in English North America in 1619 to the present day. This exhibition charts the advances and setbacks, the triumphs and trials of African Americans on their long and unfinished journey toward full equality by focusing on a series of key Virginians and key Virginia events – individuals and events that shaped the broader contours of American history.
- African Arrival: Fort Monroe Visitor and Education Center Dedication Ceremony, August 23 – 25, 2019, Hampton, VA: To commemorate the 400th Anniversary of the arrival of the first enslaved Africans in English North America, the 2019 Commemoration will showcase the dedication ceremony with hosts, Fort Monroe Authority and the National Park Service. This project involves the renovation of the former Coast Artillery School Library at Fort Monroe, where profound stories of Captain John Smith, the arrival of the first enslaved Africans, and the culmination of 242 years of slavery as the first contrabands came to Fort Monroe to receive their emancipation, will be told.
- 1619: Making of America Summit, September 25– 28, 2019, Norfolk, VA: This two-day cross-cultural event will begin with the exploration of the contributions and influences of the three founding cultures African, Native Peoples, and English. This expanding cultural tapestry of our nation will be explored by celebrated scholars, artists, film makers, musicians, and students from throughout the nation.
Richmond's own Riverfront Canal Walk commemorates the Richmond Slave Trail with seventeen markers highlighting the history of slavery in Richmond in an attempt to not only educate visitors but to also show that Richmond is more than simply a city tied to the monuments on Monument Avenue. The trail was completed in 2011. Furthermore, the Black History Museum in Richmond celebrates the long history and rich culture of African Americans in Virginia. The museum has evolved since it inception in 1981 and opening in 1991 in Richmond.
One thing is clear if any objective person evaluates the timeline of Virginia history either from a cultural or political perspective that Virginia is certainly one of the most "progressive" Southern states when it comes to the advocacy of multi-cultural diversity.
Progressive academia and activists from Black Lives Matters, BAM (By and Means Necessary), Monumental Lies, or Antifa may wish to malign Virginia history and its truth for their own purposes but make no mistake they are not portraying the Virginia that the majority of all Virginians experience. While protesters deface, destroy and malign Virginia history with the complicit support of Governor Ralph Northam (D) and Mayor Levar Stoney (D) it is important to note that these people are not speaking to the fact that last weekend alone 15 African Americans comprising 5 children were killed in Chicago in neighborhoods without policing.
Why do Progressive activists target a city that has made such "progress" in the last five decades in racial equality and recognition instead of speaking to or protesting the rising violence and death tolls experienced in cities being governed by their very own Progressive leaders.
If "Black Lives Matter" to them in truth than why is there not a massive mobilizations to address the plight of those innocent in the African American communities of Chicago or West Baltimore? Why do monuments matter more to these activist than actual lives?
Virginia will endure as it has for over 400 years long after these activists return to their own cities but the question remains how Richmond as a community will respond. The Mayor has set the city on a dangerous course in terms of future investment and economic activity that very well may hinder the city in making the necessary advancements it needs to in terms of education and development that would benefit the very people that the Progressive academia and activist claim to support.
No comments:
Post a Comment